Codex Task Logs

I'll start by reviewing the AGENTS.md file in the repo root.

I'll move into the scubaduck repo root directory now.

Let's dive into AGENTS.md and see what guidance it has for me.

I’ll follow these specific steps for activating the environment and testing. Time to inspect the repo!

I’ll take a look at the pyproject file.

I'll take a look at the tests now to see how they're structured.

I'm checking out the structure of the repository, starting with the "scubaduck" directory.

Time to open the server and get everything running.

I'll start reviewing from line 641 onward.

I need to activate the environment before running the tests to ensure they pass.

I see that the default Order By behavior leads to using the first DB column.

I'll open the section around line 452 to look at the JSON parsing code.

The order_by parameter lacks a default, but the test suggests it defaults to the first column.

I need to scroll to capture more details. Let's go ahead and do that.

I'll search for tests related to order_by in the codebase.

I'll find tests where order_by isn't explicitly set, as others already handle it.

I’ll check out the test_server_basic.py file to see what’s inside.

Continuing to scroll down to line 400 and further to review all changes.

I'm reopening the file to verify if it ends around 318 lines.

I'll check out the 'test_web_basics.py' file to start server_web tests.

I'll check for any run_query or similar functions related to querying in the code.

I’m checking the file tests/test_web_table.py to see what's inside.

I'm looking for tests, checking for the absence of order_by.

I'm verifying if all run_query calls specify order_by or if some are missing it.

I'll begin by focusing on the section around line 111.

I need to scroll more to capture the remaining information.

I'll check the content between lines 240 and 260.

I noticed run_query might fall back on ordering by the first column, even without order_by specified.

I’ll check the query() function to confirm how order_by is set when it's None.

I'll show lines from 460 to 580 to double-check the relevant section.

I noticed there's no default order_by in the code, but the UI might handle it. Let me check the static JS in scubaduck/static to confirm.

I’ll take a look between lines 220 and 300 now.

I'll check inside view_settings.js to see where order_by might be computed.

I'll find where updateDisplayTypeUI or initFromUrl set the order_by default.

I'll check if the default order_by is linked to column loading or something else.

I'm browsing through the lines around 455 to review the changes.

I didn't find a default order_by. I'll search for defaultOrderCol in the code.

I think the first column might be selected by default due to query results being unsorted.

I need to find tests that aren't specifying 'order_by' and update them.

I'll look for occurrences of "order_by" in the code, considering the tests' behavior.

I noticed only two lines. Let's expand to show the complete output.

I’m confirming the parameters being passed to the run_query call at line 9.

I’ll check the run_query at lines 57 and 71 to see if order_by is included.

I’m moving down to capture more of the changes listed.

I’ll highlight lines 249 and 257 with the run_query function call.

I'll continue past line 272 to locate the relevant content.

I see some run_query calls without an explicit order_by—let's check for others.

I think run_query might be imported but not used. Let's take a closer look.

I’ll take a look at these lines now.

I’m reviewing content around line 42 and checking for relevant details.

I'm looking through lines around 224 and nearby to make sure I capture everything.

Tests rely on the first non-string column for default order_by. I'll update them accordingly.

I'll review tests for run_query calls without an explicit order_by and update them.

It looks like there are only two run_query calls missing order_by; I'll check for similar cases.

I'll look for instances in server tests missing the "order_by" parameter.

Looks like tests/test_server.py is the only one missing "order_by". Let's check it out.

I'll search for ?order_by= in URLs to check direct API requests.

I see that there might be other instances of order_by in tests outside run_query.

I’ll review about 240 lines for the necessary changes.

I'll look for tests and files where order_by is missing.

The command is wrong due to quoting. I'll grep for "run_query(" without the ordering parts.

The grep command hasn't fully excluded lines with "order_by" due to multi-line parameters.

I'm paging through the content, moving beyond line 220 to capture the necessary info.

I'm checking the call to run_query in test_table_headers_show_aggregate, still unsure about other arguments.

I’m checking run_query instances in the code and listing those without an order_by clause.

The only run_query without 'order_by' appears to be at table_avg_no_group_by with aggregate="Avg".

I'll review the code near line 64 for any changes.

I noticed the first run_query orders by timestamp. Let's also check the one with aggregate=Avg.

I see repeated run_query calls for aggregate "Avg" without order_by, but with limits. Checking for order_by usage at other lines.

Five tests lack order_by. I'll inspect test_web_table.py and test_web_basics for potential issues.

It looks like the order_by is specified after line 9. Let's verify what's at line 225.

I'll modify the tests to specify order_by="timestamp" or ts where needed.

I'll update tests to set order_by="timestamp" after page.goto and wait.

I'll look for references to create_app('TEST') or the 'extra' table.

I'll check out the tests/test_multi_table_web.py file now.

I noticed there's no run_query. I'll search for it in other files to double-check.

I'll look at tests like test_server_timeseries to confirm if order_by is specified.

I'll add the order_by="timestamp" to run_query and derived_column_query. Let's implement!

I’ll add the “order_by” parameter with “timestamp” for both run_query calls.

I’ll add the order_by parameter and patch lines starting at 266 for derived_column_query.

I'll add select_value(page, "#order_by", "timestamp") right after page.fill("#limit", "10") and ensure proper waits.

I'll work on adjusting the numeric_cell_nowrap and date_cell_nowrap.

I'll update the derived_column_query to apply the order_by field.

I'll implement select_value next.

I see "run_query" already imported. Let's check if "select_value" is missing from imports.

I realized I need to import select_value at the top since it's now in use.

I modified test_table_headers_show_aggregate, but need to confirm other tests around line 308.

I see no query is run, so no Dive needed. I'll proceed with formatting and checks.

I'll run pyright to check for type issues in the code.

I’ll review the git status now to ensure everything's in order.

I'll check the git status to review any changes before moving forward.

I’ll gather the citation lines from the changed files for the PR message.

I'll link the changed lines and begin forming the commit message.